lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] xen/manage: Guard against user-space initiated poweroff and XenBus.
On 26/11/13 16:45, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:09:52AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 08/11/13 17:38, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> There is a race case where the user does 'poweroff'
>>> and at the same time the system admin does 'xl shutdown'.
>>
>> This isn't a Xen-specific problem is it? Wouldn't it be better to fix
>> this in generic code?
>
> Possibly. I believe the reason for the reboot_notifier to exist is
> to provide a means to fix the race.
>
>>
>> Especially since I don't think this patch actually fixes the race
>> completely.
>>
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/manage.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c
>> [...]
>>> @@ -222,7 +230,7 @@ static void shutdown_handler(struct xenbus_watch *watch,
>>> };
>>> static struct shutdown_handler *handler;
>>>
>>> - if (shutting_down != SHUTDOWN_INVALID)
>>> + if (atomic_read(&shutting_down) != SHUTDOWN_INVALID)
>>> return;
>>
>> In guest initiated poweroff at this time will still race with this
>> toolstack initiated poweroff.
>
> No, b/c the reboot notifier would have set 'shutting_down' already.

If the guest initiated power off is started here, the reboot notifier
won't have run yet.

David


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-02 13:41    [W:0.162 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site