Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:44:24 +0530 | From | Laxman Dewangan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: fix missing pincontrol configuration for Venice2 |
| |
On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 12/18/2013 05:52 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> Compare the initial population of default pinmux configuration of Venice2 >> with the chrome branch and add/fix the missing configurations. > Wow, that's a big chunk of changes. Are you sure this is correct? Why > was the original patch (which added the pinctrl nodes) so incorrect?
The pinmux which got added is based on the venice2 pinmux spreadsheet where I covered only the SFIO pin groups.
https://wiki.nvidia.com/engwiki/index.php/Platform_Design_Center/Projects_Archive/PM371#pinmux
After comparing with the chrome, I also added the pinmux for all pins which are used as GPIO and hence the change is big. This is complete pinmux based on chrome kernel-next. I booted chrome with this pinmux and not observe any behavioral change.
> Thierry, I thought you had mentioned comparing the pinctrl setup in > linux-next with the downstream kernel for Venice2 and only found a > difference in the PWM settings, which you sent a patch for. However, > this patch is much larger than that. Where's the disconnect?
| |