lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks

    * Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> wrote:

    > This patchset adds three programs that stress and measure different
    > futex operations: (i) uaddr hashing, (ii) wakeups and (iii)
    > requeuing/waiting.
    >
    > More details and usage examples in each individual patch, along with
    > parameter descriptions in the code.
    >
    > While the previous effort (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/17/207) to
    > add futex benchmarks to perf-bench failed, I strongly believe that
    > perf is an ideal place for these kinds of programs. This patchset is
    > different from Hitoshi's because it does not try to take over
    > Darren's futextest suite, and only deals with finer grained aspects
    > of the kernel's implementation, and thus mostly useful for kernel
    > hacking. Furthermore, by being part of the kernel tree, it can get
    > more attention and naturally evolve with time.

    Looks pretty useful!

    Could the two approaches be merged?

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-12-16 11:41    [W:2.520 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site