lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/9] phy: core: Change the way of_phy_get is called
Date
Hi, 

> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I [mailto:kishon@ti.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 8:23 AM
>
> On Friday 06 December 2013 04:22 PM, Kamil Debski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I [mailto:kishon@ti.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 6:31 AM
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 05 December 2013 05:59 PM, Kamil Debski wrote:
> >>> Previously the of_phy_get function took a struct device * and was
> >>> declared static. It was impossible to call it from another driver
> >>> and thus it was impossible to get phy defined
> >>
> >> It was never intended to be called from other drivers. What's up
> with
> >> the wrapper of of_phy_get, phy_get()/devm_phy_get()? Why isn't that
> >> enough?
> >
> > Implementing support for multiple phys in the ehci driver is a bit
> tricky.
> > Especially when we want to do it right. Please have a look at this
> > part of the dts file:
> >
> > + ehci@12580000 {
> > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ehci";
> > + reg = <0x12580000 0x20000>;
> > + interrupts = <0 70 0>;
> > + clocks = <&clock 304>, <&clock 305>;
> > + clock-names = "usbhost", "otg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + port@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + phys = <&usb2phy 1>;
> > + phy-names = "host";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > + port@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + phys = <&usb2phy 2>;
> > + phy-names = "hsic0";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > + port@2 {
> > + reg = <2>;
> > + phys = <&usb2phy 3>;
> > + phy-names = "hsic1";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > + };
> >
> > With the above we have a clear specification of ports and their
> > respective phys. But to do this properly the ehci driver has to
> > iterate over port nodes. It is much easier to use devm_of_phy_get by
> > giving the node as its argument.
>
> I see. There are a couple of more things we do in the wrapper that gets
> missed while exporting of_phy_get (get_device and try_module_get). You
> might want to re-work that one.

Thank you for the review. I have just sent an updated version of the core
patches.

Best wishes,
--
Kamil Debski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-13 17:01    [W:1.361 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site