lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC/RFT/PATCH V3] gpio: omap: refresh patch "be more aggressive with pm_runtime" against v3.12-rc5
From
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>
> try to keep gpio block suspended as much as possible.
>
> Tested with pandaboard and a sysfs exported gpio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
>
> [caesarxuchao@gmail.com : Refreshed against v3.12-rc5, and added
> revision check to enable aggressive pm_runtime on OMAP4-only. Because
> am33xx_gpio_sysc.idlemodes seems to be wrongly marked as
> SIDLE_SMART_WKUP, which might cause missed interrupts with this patch.
> Tested on Pandaboard rev A2.]
> Signed-off-by: Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@gmail.com>
> ---
> changes since v2:
> *add wrapper function to avoid 'is_aggressive_pm' check everywhere, as
> suggested by Santosh Shilimkar
> *fix format issue in commit log

I'm dropping this until you convince Kevin/Tony that this is
the way to go.

One thing caught my eye, you add:

> +static void _aggressive_pm_runtime_get_sync(struct gpio_bank *bank)
> +static void _aggressive_pm_runtime_put(struct gpio_bank *bank)
(..)

Then everywhere:

> + _aggressive_pm_runtime_get_sync(bank);
(...)
> + _aggressive_pm_runtime_put(bank);

Aggressive, argh, runtime PM is agressive by definition. If you
want to switch this on and off use the compile option
to enable/disable runtime PM altogether and do not wrap it
like this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-12 19:41    [W:0.108 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site