[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the tree
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:39:59PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:33:24PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The changes for direct I/O from kernel space have been in for a long
> > time, and they are blocking multiple consumers of the interface from
> > getting submitted for about a year now. Even if the guts of the
> > direct-io code will get a write based on another patchset from Kent
> > that will go on top of the immutable iovec changes we need the
> > interfaces now and not another year down the road.
> What else is blocked on this patch series? Honest question.

From me alone:
Support for ecryptfs to not double cache.
AIO support for target_core_file.

To replace code in staging:
Removal of the lustre-specific loop driver.

And I remember others claiming to want to submit bits, too.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-08 09:01    [W:0.063 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site