lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: common location for devicetree files
From
Date

On Nov 8, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:21:58PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> As we start having more sharing of device trees between architectures
>> (arm & arm64, arm & powerpc, guessing maybe mips & arm) we need dts to
>> live in location that
>>
>> I was wondering what people felt about doing:
>>
>> arch/dts/<VENDOR>/
>>
>> as a common location that could be shared. I'm up for other
>> suggestions.
>
> What do we really need to do before the move? Should all arch dts files
> be able to #include from any arch? What's the minimum churn needed to
> accomplish that? Maybe just move the needed bits to arch/dts/include/ ?
>
> I'm not real keen on separating by vendor. For example, us mvebu folks
> would probably miss useful/duplicated effort in another vendor's
> subdirectory. Which was the whole reason for moving driver code out of
> machine directories to begin with.


Can you explain that further, what would you miss from other vendors. All the patches should still be going via devicetree ML.

- k

--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-08 19:21    [W:0.060 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site