lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 2/4] irq_work: Provide a irq work that can be processed on any cpu
Date
Provide new irq work flag - IRQ_WORK_UNBOUND - meaning that can be
processed on any cpu. This flag implies IRQ_WORK_LAZY so that things are
simple and we don't have to pick any particular cpu to do the work. We
just do the work from a timer tick on whichever cpu it happens first.
This is useful as a lightweight and simple code path without locking or
other dependencies to offload work to other cpu if possible.

We will use this type of irq work to make a guarantee of forward
progress of printing to a (serial) console when printing on one cpu
would cause interrupts to be disabled for too long.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
include/linux/irq_work.h | 2 ++
kernel/irq_work.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
index 66017028dcb3..ca07a16355ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY 2UL
#define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS 3UL
#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY 4UL /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
+#define __IRQ_WORK_UNBOUND 8UL /* Use IRQ_WORK_UNBOUND instead! */
+#define IRQ_WORK_UNBOUND (__IRQ_WORK_UNBOUND | IRQ_WORK_LAZY) /* Any cpu can process this work */

struct irq_work {
unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index 55fcce6065cf..b06350b63c67 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, irq_work_list);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, irq_work_raised);

+/* List of irq-work any CPU can pick up */
+static LLIST_HEAD(unbound_irq_work_list);
+
/*
* Claim the entry so that no one else will poke at it.
*/
@@ -70,12 +73,16 @@ void irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
/* Queue the entry and raise the IPI if needed. */
preempt_disable();

- llist_add(&work->llnode, &__get_cpu_var(irq_work_list));
+ if (work->flags & __IRQ_WORK_UNBOUND)
+ llist_add(&work->llnode, &unbound_irq_work_list);
+ else
+ llist_add(&work->llnode, &__get_cpu_var(irq_work_list));

/*
* If the work is not "lazy" or the tick is stopped, raise the irq
* work interrupt (if supported by the arch), otherwise, just wait
- * for the next tick.
+ * for the next tick. We do this even for unbound work to make sure
+ * *some* CPU will be doing the work.
*/
if (!(work->flags & IRQ_WORK_LAZY) || tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) {
if (!this_cpu_cmpxchg(irq_work_raised, 0, 1))
@@ -100,28 +107,17 @@ bool irq_work_needs_cpu(void)
return true;
}

-static void __irq_work_run(void)
+static void process_irq_work_list(struct llist_head *llhead)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct irq_work *work;
- struct llist_head *this_list;
struct llist_node *llnode;

-
- /*
- * Reset the "raised" state right before we check the list because
- * an NMI may enqueue after we find the list empty from the runner.
- */
- __this_cpu_write(irq_work_raised, 0);
- barrier();
-
- this_list = &__get_cpu_var(irq_work_list);
- if (llist_empty(this_list))
+ if (llist_empty(llhead))
return;

BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
-
- llnode = llist_del_all(this_list);
+ llnode = llist_del_all(llhead);
while (llnode != NULL) {
work = llist_entry(llnode, struct irq_work, llnode);

@@ -146,6 +142,19 @@ static void __irq_work_run(void)
}
}

+static void __irq_work_run(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Reset the "raised" state right before we check the list because
+ * an NMI may enqueue after we find the list empty from the runner.
+ */
+ __this_cpu_write(irq_work_raised, 0);
+ barrier();
+
+ process_irq_work_list(&__get_cpu_var(irq_work_list));
+ process_irq_work_list(&unbound_irq_work_list);
+}
+
/*
* Run the irq_work entries on this cpu. Requires to be ran from hardirq
* context with local IRQs disabled.
--
1.8.1.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-07 23:21    [W:0.082 / U:1.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site