Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:52:56 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC patch 0/5] futex: Allow lockless empty check of hashbucket plist in futex_wake() |
| |
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:12:31AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> I am becoming hesitant about this approach. The following are some > results, from my quad-core laptop, measuring the latency of nthread > wakeups (1 at a time). In addition, failed wait calls never occur -- so > we don't end up including the (otherwise minimal) overhead of the list > queue+dequeue, only measuring the smp_mb() usage when !empty list never > occurs. > > +---------+--------------------+--------+-------------------+--------+----------+ > | threads | baseline time (ms) | stddev | patched time (ms) | stddev | overhead | > +---------+--------------------+--------+-------------------+--------+----------+ > | 512 | 4.2410 | 0.9762 | 12.3660 | 5.1020 | +191.58% | > | 256 | 2.7750 | 0.3997 | 7.0220 | 2.9436 | +153.04% | > | 128 | 1.4910 | 0.4188 | 3.7430 | 0.8223 | +151.03% | > | 64 | 0.8970 | 0.3455 | 2.5570 | 0.3710 | +185.06% | > | 32 | 0.3620 | 0.2242 | 1.1300 | 0.4716 | +212.15% | > +---------+--------------------+--------+-------------------+--------+----------+ >
Whee, this is far more overhead than I would have expected... pretty impressive really for a simple mfence ;-)
| |