lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/22] tools lib traceevent: Add plugin support
Date
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:12:19 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:17:06 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> >
>> [SNIP[
>> > +static void
>> > +load_plugin(struct pevent *pevent, const char *path,
>> > + const char *file, void *data)
>> > +{
>> > + struct plugin_list **plugin_list = data;
>> > + pevent_plugin_load_func func;
>> > + struct plugin_list *list;
>> > + const char *alias;
>> > + char *plugin;
>> > + void *handle;
>> > +
>> > + plugin = malloc_or_die(strlen(path) + strlen(file) + 2);
>>
>> I'd like not to see this malloc_or_die() anymore in a new code. Just
>> returning after showing a warning looks enough here.
>
> Yeah I agree. This is a relic from my code. I think it's OK to add
> here, as it is pretty much direct port of my code, and then we can just
> add a patch against it to remove it.

Okay. I agree that it'd be better to make them separate patches.

>
>>
>> > +
>> > + strcpy(plugin, path);
>> > + strcat(plugin, "/");
>> > + strcat(plugin, file);
>> > +
>> > + handle = dlopen(plugin, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL);
>>
>> Why RTLD_NOW and RTLD_GLOBAL? Hmm.. maybe using _NOW is needed to
>> prevent a runtime error, but not sure why _GLOBAL is needed.
>
> Yes, we want to make sure all symbols defined are available at time of
> load, otherwise bail out.
>
>>
>> IIUC _GLOBAL is for exporting symbols to *other libraries*. Is it
>> intended for this plugin support?
>
> That was the plan. To have one plugin supply a set of functions that
> other plugins may use. That is what GLOBAL is for, right? I don't
> recall if I every did this, but it was something I wanted for future
> work.
>
> Now if we don't need it, we could remove it, but is it bad to have?

I might be slow down symbol resolution of new plugins tiny bit. But I
don't think it's a real problem as its effect will be negligible.

I don't object the code but just want to know your intention. :)

Thanks,
Namhyung


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-25 08:41    [W:0.150 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site