lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 10/15] usb: phy: msm: Add device tree support and binding information
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:51:45PM +0000, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
>
> Allows MSM OTG controller to be specified via device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-hsusb.txt | 57 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-hsusb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-hsusb.txt
> index 0a85eba..f1045e3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-hsusb.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-hsusb.txt
> @@ -30,4 +30,59 @@ Required properties:
> dr_mode = "peripheral";
> interrupts = <0 134 0>;
> usb-phy = <&usb_otg>;
> - };
> \ No newline at end of file
> + };
> +
> +USB PHY with optional OTG:
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should contain "qcom,usb-otg-ci" for chipsets with
> + Chipidea 45nm PHY or "qcom,usb-otg-snps" for chipsets
> + with Synopsys 28nm PHY

To make this easier to read and extend in future, I'd reorganise this
like so:

compatible: should contain:
* "qcom,usb-otg-ci" for chipsets with Chipidea 45nm PHY
* "qcom,usb-otg-snps" for chipsets with Synopsys 28nm PHY
> +- regs: offset and length of the register set in the memory map
> +- interrupts: interrupt-specifier for the OTG interrupt.
> +
> +- clocks: A list of phandle + clock-specifier pairs for the
> + clocks listed in clock-names
> +- clock-names: Should contain the following:
> + "phy" USB PHY reference clock
> + "core" Protocol engine clock
> + "iface" Interface bus clock
> + "alt_core" Optional: Protocol engine clock for targets with asynchronous
> + reset methodology.

I'd rearrange that last entry:

"alt_core": Protocol engine clock for targets with asynchronous
reset methodology. (optional)

> +
> +- dr_mode: One of "host", "peripheral" or "otg". Defaults to "otg"

If this has a default and thus isn't required, it should be listed as
optional.

> +
> +- vdccx-supply: phandle to the regulator for the vdd supply for
> + digital circuit operation.
> +- v1p8-supply: phandle to the regulator for the 1.8V supply
> +- v3p3-supply: phandle to the regulator for the 3.3V supply
> +
> +- qcom,otg-control: OTG control (VBUS and ID notifications) can be one of
> + 1 - PHY control
> + 2 - PMIC control
> + 3 - User control (via debugfs)

NAK. This does not seem like a description of the hardware, and given
the debugfs comment is fundamentally tied to the way Linux functions
today.

> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- qcom,phy-init-sequence: PHY configuration sequence. val, reg pairs
> + terminate with -1

What is this? I'm really not keen on having arbitrary register/memory
poking sequences in the dt.

Why does it need to be terminated? Surely the size of the property tells
you that it's terminated.

> +
> +Example HSUSB OTG controller device node:
> +
> + usb@f9a55000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,usb-otg-snps";
> + reg = <0xf9a55000 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <0 134 0>;;

s/;;/;/

> + dr_mode = "peripheral";
> +
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_XO_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_SYSTEM_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_AHB_CLK>;
> +
> + clock-names = "phy", "core", "iface";
> +
> + vddcx-supply = <&pm8841_s2_corner>;
> + v1p8-supply = <&pm8941_l6>;
> + v3p3-supply = <&pm8941_l24>;
> +
> + qcom,otg-control = <1>;
> + qcom,phy-init-sequence = <0x01 0x90 0xffffffff>;

I believe modern dtc versions can handle negative numbers directly.

[...]

> +static int msm_otg_read_dt(struct platform_device *pdev, struct msm_otg *motg)
> +{
> + struct msm_otg_platform_data *pdata;
> + const struct of_device_id *id;
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + int len = 0;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + motg->pdata = pdata;
> +
> + id = of_match_device(msm_otg_dt_match, &pdev->dev);
> + pdata->phy_type = (int) id->data;
> +
> + pdata->mode = of_usb_get_dr_mode(node);
> + if (pdata->mode == USB_DR_MODE_UNKNOWN)
> + pdata->mode = USB_DR_MODE_OTG;
> +
> + pdata->otg_control = OTG_PHY_CONTROL;
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,otg-control", &val))
> + pdata->otg_control = val;

Is this validated elsewhere?

Thanks,
Mark.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-15 18:21    [W:0.161 / U:1.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site