[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/63] mm: Do not flush TLB during protection change if !pte_present && !migration_entry
On 10/07/2013 06:28 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> NUMA PTE scanning is expensive both in terms of the scanning itself and
> the TLB flush if there are any updates. Currently non-present PTEs are
> accounted for as an update and incurring a TLB flush where it is only
> necessary for anonymous migration entries. This patch addresses the
> problem and should reduce TLB flushes.
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <>

All rights reversed

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-07 17:41    [W:0.766 / U:7.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site