Theoretically, the maximize size of "%u" is 11 (10 + '\0'), so need set
MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10, and also 'irq' is unsigned int, so need
use "%u" instead of "%d".

In real world, it may not cause issue, but still recommend to fix the
'theoretical' bugs (especially original definition already considered
about 'theoretical' using).


Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
---
 kernel/irq/proc.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c
index 36f6ee1..efda701 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void register_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action)
 
 #undef MAX_NAMELEN
 
-#define MAX_NAMELEN 10
+#define MAX_NAMELEN 11
 
 void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 		return;
 
 	memset(name, 0, MAX_NAMELEN);
-	sprintf(name, "%d", irq);
+	sprintf(name, "%u", irq);
 
 	/* create /proc/irq/1234 */
 	desc->dir = proc_mkdir(name, root_irq_dir);
-- 
1.7.7.6