lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Oct 3
    On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
    > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
    >> On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Hi all,
    >>>
    >>> Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
    >>> master branch of the repository below:
    >>>
    >>> git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
    >>>
    >>> A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience.
    >>>
    >>> A few new conflicts today caused by the removal of the h8300
    >>> architecture which I didn't report for triviality. Several new build
    >>> failures were found as a result of running allmodconfig tests between
    >>> merges all of which have been reported and I'm still carrying the i.MX
    >>> fix that Thierry has been carrying.
    >>>
    >>> Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped
    >>> the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff covered in his
    >>> autobuilder. I'm going to use allyesconfig tomorrow since that should
    >>> run faster so hopefully I can cover the ARM, i386 and x86_64 configs
    >>> again.
    >>>
    >>
    >> I could try to set up the buildbot farm I am using for -stable candidates
    >> to also test the -next tree. Would that help ?
    >
    > ARM is pretty well-covered by my builds, I post results at:
    >
    > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports
    >

    Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
    collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ?

    Thanks,
    Guenter



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-10-04 16:21    [W:5.732 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site