Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 04 Oct 2013 06:44:56 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 3 |
| |
On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >> On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the >>> master branch of the repository below: >>> >>> git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git >>> >>> A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience. >>> >>> A few new conflicts today caused by the removal of the h8300 >>> architecture which I didn't report for triviality. Several new build >>> failures were found as a result of running allmodconfig tests between >>> merges all of which have been reported and I'm still carrying the i.MX >>> fix that Thierry has been carrying. >>> >>> Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped >>> the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff covered in his >>> autobuilder. I'm going to use allyesconfig tomorrow since that should >>> run faster so hopefully I can cover the ARM, i386 and x86_64 configs >>> again. >>> >> >> I could try to set up the buildbot farm I am using for -stable candidates >> to also test the -next tree. Would that help ? > > ARM is pretty well-covered by my builds, I post results at: > > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports >
Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ?
Thanks, Guenter
| |