lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Use of drivers/platform and matching include?
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:09:14AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:46:30AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > I don't have a good answer though. If it wasn't for the arm64 fork,
> > > locating these under arch/arm somewhere would really be the reasonable
> > > answer, like we used to do on powerpc. :(
> >
> > Sounds like yet-another-good reason why there shouldn't be an arm64
> > "fork" at all :(
> >
> > The arm community created this mess, you all can fix it up, it's not too
> > late.
>
> I said at the time, way before arm64 was merged that it should not be a
> separate arch. Every bit of feedback I gave on arm64 got shouted down
> by Catalin. ARM64 is Catalin's baby and he wants to protect it at all
> costs.

My counter arguments weren't probably clear to you. I want to protect a
clean, legacy-free AArch64 implementation at all costs.

--
Catalin


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-04 14:21    [W:0.069 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site