lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86, microcode, Fix long microcode load time when firmware file is missing [v2]


On 10/28/2013 11:05 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:06:08 -0400,
> Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>> If no firmware is found on the system that matches the processor, the
>> microcode module can take hours to load. For example on recent kernels
>> when loading the microcode module on an Intel system:
>>
>> [ 239.532116] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 299.693447] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 359.821972] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 419.960263] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 480.090024] microcode: CPU4 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> ...
>> [ 2825.151364] microcode: CPU43 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 2885.280863] microcode: CPU44 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 2945.410719] microcode: CPU45 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 3005.540541] microcode: CPU46 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> [ 3065.670405] microcode: CPU47 sig=0x306e4, pf=0x1, revision=0x413
>> ...
>> etc.
>>
>> Similarly there is a 60 second "hang" when loading the AMD module, which
>> isn't as bad as the Intel situation. This is because the AMD microcode
>> loader only attempts to look for the firmware on the boot_cpu and, if
>> found, loads the microcode on each cpu. This patch does the same for the
>> Intel microcode, and it obviously peeds up the module load if there is no
>> microcode update available.
>>
>> After making this change, the old microcode loading code and the new
>> loading code can be cleaned up and unified in the core code.
>>
>> This patch was tested on several systems (both AMD and Intel) with the
>> microcode in place and without, as well as on several different OSes.
>
> Does simply disabling CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER work without your
> patch?
>
> If yes, it's an infamous udev issue. An easier solution would be to
> create a function that does only the direct f/w loading without
> usermode helper, and call it in the microcode driver.
>
> An untested quick fix patch is attached below.
>
>

Takashi, this patch works AFAICT.

I wish I had thought of doing it this way to begin with ...

If you choose to submit, can you add a Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava
<prarit@redhat.com>

Thanks,

P.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-31 17:01    [W:0.083 / U:1.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site