lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] ACPICA: Stable material of ACPI executer fixes for linux-3.8.
Date
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 05:08:50 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:39:21PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 31, 2013 09:07:40 AM Lv Zheng wrote:
> > > There are bug-fixes for AML interpreter upstreamed, fixing some serious
> > > issues found in recent platforms. These fixes make Linux AML interpreter
> > > more ACPI 2.0 ASL concept compliant. Further AML interpreter fixes should
> > > be based on such improvements, thus they are good materials for stable.
> > >
> > > This patch set can be safely applied to linux-3.8:
> > > commit 19f949f52599ba7c3f67a5897ac6be14bfcb1200 upstream.
> > >
> > > The patch set has passed build/boot tests on the following machines:
> > > Dell Inspiron Mini 1010 (i386)
> > > HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (x86-64)
> > >
> > > Bob Moore (4):
> > > ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix Store() when implicit conversion is not
> > > possible.
> > > ACPICA: DeRefOf operator: Update to fully resolve FieldUnit and
> > > BufferField refs.
> > > ACPICA: Return error if DerefOf resolves to a null package element.
> > > ACPICA: Fix for a Store->ArgX when ArgX contains a reference to a
> > > field.
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Please take patches [1-4/4] for stable.
>
> "Which" stable tree?
>
> I don't do 3.8, it's long been end-of-life, although one company is
> trying to keep it alive, but that's not me.
>
> I'm only handling 3.4, 3.10, and 3.11 stable trees right now, which
> one(s) should these be applied to?

3.10.x and 3.11.x then.

Lv, do the original mainline commits apply to these kernels?

Rafael



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-31 13:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site