lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] kernel/kallsyms.c: only show legal kernel symbol
Date
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:20:19PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> writes:
>> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:44:30 +1030
>> > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> I don't know... It would be your job, as the person making the change,
>> >> to find all the users of kallsyms and prove that.
>> >>
>> >> This is why it is easier not to include incorrect values in the kernel's
>> >> kallsyms in the first place.
>> >
>> > OK, thanks for your comment, and I figured out one way to do it in
>> > scripts/kallsyms.c, could you comment on below patch?
>>
>> Looks great! Seems like we spent more time arguing than it took you to
>> code that up.
>>
>> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>>
>> Russell, this seems logical for you to take along with the changes which
>> caused the problem?
>
> The changes are already in mainline since a long time (back in July/August
> time). Am I the right person to take stuff for scripts/ ? Isn't that
> more kbuild territory?

Kallsyms tends to fall between modules and scripts. I assume it's not
urgent, so no cc:stable on this one.

Applied,
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-31 05:21    [W:0.076 / U:3.968 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site