lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] futex: Remove requirement for lock_page in get_futex_key
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Mel Gorman wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner and Peter Zijlstra discussed off-list that real-time users
> currently have a problem with the page lock being contended for unbounded
> periods of time during futex operations. The three of us discussed the
> possibiltity that the page lock is unnecessary in this case because we are
> not concerned with the usual races with reclaim and page cache updates. For
> anonymous pages, the associated futex object is the mm_struct which does
> not require the page lock. For inodes, we should be able to check under
> RCU read lock if the page mapping is still valid to take a reference to
> the inode. This just leaves one rare race that requires the page lock
> in the slow path. This patch does not completely eliminate the page lock
> but it should reduce contention in the majority of cases.
>
> Patch boots and futextest did not explode but I did no comparison
> performance tests. Thomas, do you have details of the workload that
> drove you to examine this problem? Alternatively, can you test it and

The scenario is simple. All you need is a PSHARED futex.

Task A
get_futex_key()
lock_page()

---> preemption

Now any other task trying to lock that page will have to wait until
task A gets scheduled back in, which is an unbound time.

It takes quite some time to reproduce, but I'll ask the people who
have that workload to give it a try.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-30 10:01    [W:0.080 / U:2.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site