lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: tegra: use pll_ref as the pll_e parent
    On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
    > Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 09:41 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
    > > On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
    > > > Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
    > > > Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
    > >
    > > Why? What benefit does this give, or what bug does this fix?
    > >
    > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
    > >
    > > > val_aux = pll_readl(pll_params->aux_reg, pll);
    > > >
    > > > if (val & PLL_BASE_ENABLE) {
    > > > - if (!(val_aux & PLLE_AUX_PLLRE_SEL))
    > > > + if ((val_aux & PLLE_AUX_PLLRE_SEL) || (val_aux & val_aux))
    > >
    > > Isn't "|| (val_aux & val_aux)" always true, at least if the value is
    > > non-zero? Either this should be simply "|| val_aux", or one of those two
    > > "val_aux" is the wrong thing.
    > >
    > > > WARN(1, "pll_e enabled with unsupported parent %s\n",
    > > > - (val & PLLE_AUX_PLLP_SEL) ? "pllp_out0" : "pll_ref");
    > > > + (val_aux & PLLE_AUX_PLLP_SEL) ? "pllp_out0" :
    > > > + "pll_re_vco");
    > > > } else {
    > > > - val_aux |= PLLE_AUX_PLLRE_SEL;
    > > > + val_aux &= ~(PLLE_AUX_PLLRE_SEL | PLLE_AUX_PLLP_SEL);
    > > > pll_writel(val, pll_params->aux_reg, pll);
    > > > }
    > >
    > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c
    > >
    > > > @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static struct tegra_clk_pll_freq_table pll_e_freq_table[] = {
    > > > /* PLLE special case: use cpcon field to store cml divider value */
    > > > {336000000, 100000000, 100, 21, 16, 11},
    > > > {312000000, 100000000, 200, 26, 24, 13},
    > > > + {12000000, 100000000, 200, 1, 24, 13},
    > >
    > > Presumably this is because pll_ref is the crystal, which runs at 12MHz.
    > > What if it doesn't; Tegra supports a bunch of other crystal rates. Don't
    > > we need entries for all the other potential crystal rates too?
    >
    > The TRM states that PCIe and thus PLLE are only supported with 12MHz
    > external crystal rate.
    >

    This is has been different for Tegra114 at least (where PLLE is used for USB3)

    Cheers,

    Peter.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-10-30 23:41    [W:3.049 / U:0.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site