lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/12] sb_edac: move PCI IDs to pci_ids.h
Em Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:35:17 -0400
Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> escreveu:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:21:49AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > <m.chehab@samsung.com> wrote:
> > > Em Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:40:20 +0100
> > > Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> escreveu:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:26:55PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> > >> > According to the comment, it should be done before submitting upstream.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
> > >> > ---
> > >> > drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 21 ++-------------------
> > >> > include/linux/pci_ids.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > >> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> > >> > index e04462b..4cdd948 100644
> > >> > --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> > >> > +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> > >> > @@ -57,26 +57,9 @@ static int probed;
> > >> > */
> > >> >
> > >> > /*
> > >> > - * FIXME: For now, let's order by device function, as it makes
> > >> > - * easier for driver's development process. This table should be
> > >> > - * moved to pci_id.h when submitted upstream
> > >>
> > >> Why, is anything else besides sb_edac.c using those?
> > >>
> > > I think that this patch makes sense, as the other Sandy Bridge registers
> > > are at pci_ids.h. So, it is a matter of consistency.
> > >
> > > Also, I won't doubt that other drivers could need to access those, as
> > > there are other things there on a few of those PCI IDs.
> > >
> > > Yet, on patch 12/12, you're adding the Ivy Bridge specific PCI IDs
> > > inside the driver.
> > >
> > > So, IMHO, you should either move all to pci_ids.h or to keep them inside
> > > the driver.
> > >
> > > My personal taste would be to move them all to pci_ids.h.
> >
> > As long as it follows the guideline at the top of pci_ids.h (add them
> > there only if they are shared between multiple drivers), I'm fine with
> > putting them in pci_ids.h.
>
> Fair enough, I think we can drop the first patch. I checked and all the
> patches apply without the first one and it builds fine. Mauro, want me
> to resubmit the patchset anyway?

No need.

Thanks!
Mauro


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-30 22:21    [W:0.042 / U:59.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site