lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> >There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz
> >and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
>
> Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings
> and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly.
>
> Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2
> Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed
> Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed
> dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions
> compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit,
> alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Thanks for testing both of these, sorry for the mess with -rc2.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-04 05:01    [W:0.146 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site