lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 net-next] fix unsafe set_memory_rw from softirq
From
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 15:47 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -722,7 +725,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_unattached_filter_destroy);
>>> int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
>>> {
>>> struct sk_filter *fp, *old_fp;
>>> - unsigned int fsize = sizeof(struct sock_filter) * fprog->len;
>>> + unsigned int fsize = max(sizeof(struct sock_filter) * fprog->len,
>>> + sizeof(struct work_struct));
>>> int err;
>>>
>>> if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_FILTER_LOCKED))
>>
>> Thats broken, as we might copy more data from user than expected,
>> and eventually trigger EFAULT :
>>
>> if (copy_from_user(fp->insns, fprog->filter, fsize)) {
>
> yes. will fix.

tested on x86_64/i386 only
with tcpdump and netsniff 1-4k filter size.
Thank you for careful review.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-04 04:41    [W:0.192 / U:1.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site