lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] EFI changes

* Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Oct, at 04:55:25PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 28 Oct, at 02:44:13PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > and this breaks the ARM build:
> > > >
> > > > In file included from /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:44:
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/efi.h:842:21: error: asm/efi.h: No such file or directory
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel':
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:638: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_enabled'
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:639: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_late_init'
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:640: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_free_boot_services'
> > >
> > > Ah, that's my own fault because my 'next' branch doesn't include
> > > the ARM EFI support. Where did you get the patches from? Are they
> > > in linux-next?
> >
> > It's all in tip:x86/efi.
> >
> > > I'm inclined to drop the cleanup patch for now and do it later,
> > > once things have settled because it's also causing conflicts for
> > > Borislav's work.
> >
> > Sure.
>
> OK, I've pushed out the 'next' branch and retagged it as 'efi-next'
> (again), which hopefully should be finally free from build errors.

Please send it out as a new pull requests so that the diffstat and
shortlog can be seen and double checked, etc.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-29 09:41    [W:0.041 / U:10.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site