[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Revert 9745cdb36da83aeec198650b410ca06304cf792 ("select: use freezable blocking call")?
On 10/29/2013 10:15 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 21:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On 10/29/2013 8:41 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> 4) Should this commit be reverted? Or is there a better fix?
>> In short, yes, it should.
>> I've already queued up a revert of something very similar and I'm going
>> to revert this one too.
> If you do, the revert should go into stable for v3.11+ too, shouldn't
> it?

I'll ask stable to pick it up later (or you can do that too).


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-29 22:41    [W:0.050 / U:3.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site