lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] x86: unify copy_from_user() size checking

* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 26.10.13 at 12:31, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > * Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >> I'd like to point out though that with __compiletime_object_size()
> >> being restricted to gcc before 4.6, the whole construct is going to
> >> become more and more pointless going forward. I would question
> >> however that commit 2fb0815c9ee6b9ac50e15dd8360ec76d9fa46a2 ("gcc4:
> >> disable __compiletime_object_size for GCC 4.6+") was really necessary,
> >> and instead this should have been dealt with as is done here from the
> >> beginning.
> >
> > Can we now revert 2fb0815c9ee6?
>
> Actually I'm afraid parisc would first need to follow the changes
> done on x86 here, or else they'd run into (compile time) issues
> (s390 and tile only emit warnings, i.e. would at worst suffer
> cosmetically unless subtrees putting -Werror in place are
> affected).

Given how trivial __compiletime_object_size() is, we could replicate
a (differently named) copy of that in x86 uaccess.h?

This is something that would be pretty platform dependent anyway.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-29 11:21    [W:0.098 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site