lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/3] Support for perf to probe into SDT markers:
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@iki.fi> [2013-10-28 14:42:13]:

> >So, it still needs a concrete binary path to list or, we should
> >support a syntax which specify actual binary, as like as below.
> >
> > perf probe 'my_event=%libc:setjmp@/lib64/libc.so.6'
> >
> >And perf list may show the marker as in same syntax (for copy&paste).
> >
> ># perf list --sdt
> > %libc:setjmp@/lib64/libc.so.6
> > ...
> >
> >Note that we need '%' to separate namespace :(, since user can define
> >any marker(provider) name in their binary...
>
> Sure, you need to support that sort of 'fully qualified name' for
> duplicate symbols but the default 'libc:setjmp' should still point
> to system libc.

But what if a system has both 32 bit libc and 64 bit libc?
Wont we could end up with 2 libc:setjmp?
Should we give some more intelligence into perf to choose the 64 bit
libc over 32 bit one?

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-28 16:01    [W:1.066 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site