[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] slub: Proper kmemleak tracking if CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG disabled
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> Kmemleak doesn't depend on SLUB_DEBUG (at least it didn't originally ;),
> so I don't think we should add an artificial dependency (or select). Can
> we have kmemleak_*() calls in both debug and !debug hooks?

Yes if you move the hook calls out from under CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-02 18:41    [W:0.080 / U:12.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site