lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 8/9] ACPI, APEI, CPER: Cleanup CPER memory error output format
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 05:31:21PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:31:21 +0530
> From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>, tony.luck@intel.com,
> bp@alien8.de, joe@perches.com, m.chehab@samsung.com
> CC: arozansk@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] ACPI, APEI, CPER: Cleanup CPER memory error
> output format
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderbird/24.0
>
[...]
> >
> >@@ -358,17 +349,21 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
> > struct acpi_generic_data *gdata;
> > unsigned int data_len, gedata_len;
> > int sec_no = 0;
> >+ char newpfx[64];
> > __u16 severity;
> >
> >- printk("%s""Generic Hardware Error Status\n", pfx);
> > severity = estatus->error_severity;
> >- printk("%s""severity: %d, %s\n", pfx, severity,
> >- cper_severity_str(severity));
> >+ if (severity != CPER_SEV_FATAL)
>
> Shouldn't this just be (severity == CPER_SEV_CORRECTED)?
>
> Thanks,
> Naveen
>
IMO, only fatal error can't be handlered gracefully in current
kernel plus H/W. Once it can be recovered by H/W and OS, we
can call it recovered.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-19 14:01    [W:0.219 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site