[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/15] slab: overload struct slab over struct page to reduce memory usage
Andrew Morton <> writes:
> One example is mm/memory-failure.c:memory_failure(). It starts with a
> raw pfn, uses that to get at the `struct page', then starts playing
> around with it. Will that code still work correctly when some of the
> page's fields have been overlayed with slab-specific contents?

As long as PageSlab() works correctly memory_failure should be happy.

> This issue hasn't been well thought through. Given a random struct
> page, there isn't any protocol to determine what it actually *is*.
> It's a plain old variant record, but it lacks the agreed-upon tag field
> which tells users which variant is currently in use.

PageSlab() should work for this right?

For the generic case it may not though.


-- -- Speaking for myself only

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-20 01:01    [W:0.174 / U:3.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site