lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Oct 17 (pinctrl-single.c)
* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> [131018 16:41]:
> On 10/18/13 16:39, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Looks like we need a little bit of arch specific handling
> > with the generic IRQ. Fix the issue with an ifdef the
> > same way as other drivers do.
> >
> > ARM needs things set to IRQF_VALID, which also then sets
> > noprobe. Others seem to use just irq_set_noprobe().
> >
> > Otherwise we can get:
> >
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c: In function 'pcs_irqdomain_map':
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c:1750:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_irq_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Did you address this error? I don't see a fix for it...

Yes set_irq_flags() is defined for ARM archs in
arch/arm/include/asm/hw_irq.h which is included from
include/linux/irq.h as <asm/hw_irq.h>. So the ifdef
below takes care of that too.

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > + set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> > +#else
> > + irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> > +#endif

Regards,

Tony


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-19 02:21    [W:0.039 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site