Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:03:52 +0200 | From | Michael Opdenacker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] init: make init failures more explicit |
| |
On 10/18/2013 02:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Michael Opdenacker > <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> wrote: >> + pr_err("Starting init: %s exists but couldn't execute it (error: %d - see errno-base.h and errno.h)\n", > IMHO the "- see errno-base.h and errno.h" is a bit overkill. Yes, I was wondering. Good to have your opinion on this!
I'll post an update with just the error number, also adding the error code to the other two "Failed to execute" error messages.
Thanks!
Michael.
-- Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com +33 484 258 098
| |