[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: About [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Provide a dummy regulator with full constraints
On 10/16/2013 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:36:46PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> On 10/12/2013 08:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> OK, I think the device tree board code just needs to set full
>>> constraints during machine initialisation. We can't have multiple
>> Hi, Mark, do you mean we can call regulator_has_full_constraints(), but
>> some platforms doesn't have board file now, they only have dts file, how
>> to call this functions?
> There is still a board file for DT machines, it's just shared between
> all machines - it should be doing the call instead of the regulator
> framework trying to retrofit it.

So do you mean it should call the regulator_has_full_constraints() in
the .init_machine for all machines? If so, this will affect all boards,
for example, in arch/arm/mach-tegra, if we set full constraints in the
shared board file tegra.c, all tegra boards will be set, is it right?


> * Unknown Key
> * 0x7EA229BD

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-17 07:21    [W:0.054 / U:4.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site