[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> So I didn't understand what was wrong with:
> #define __this_cpu_read(pcp) \
> (__this_cpu_preempt_check("read"), raw_this_cpu_read(pcp))
> And idem for all others. This is 1) shorter to write; and 2) makes it
> blindingly obvious that the implementations are actually the same.

Nothing wrong with that. It just increases the scope of this patch to
require modifications to arch code and I already have trouble enough
following through on all the issues that were raised so far.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-16 17:41    [W:0.067 / U:7.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site