lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu operations V4

* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:

> > That won't cause email servers to reject the mails, it just makes the
> > patches a bit harder to review.
>
> I do not have any control over how my ISP sorts these emails. [...]

Your series from today has proper threading - so after all it _was_
possible for you to send a patch series correctly?

Note that you did not address the other problem that David Miller pointed
out, the Cc list still looks messed up:

Message-Id: <20131015180050.084352174@linux.com>
User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:58:53 -0500
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linuxfoundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] net: Replace __get_cpu_var uses

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-16 13:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site