Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:37:51 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu operations V4 |
| |
* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> > That won't cause email servers to reject the mails, it just makes the > > patches a bit harder to review. > > I do not have any control over how my ISP sorts these emails. [...]
Your series from today has proper threading - so after all it _was_ possible for you to send a patch series correctly?
Note that you did not address the other problem that David Miller pointed out, the Cc list still looks messed up:
Message-Id: <20131015180050.084352174@linux.com> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:58:53 -0500 From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: akpm@linuxfoundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Subject: [PATCH 01/10] net: Replace __get_cpu_var uses
Thanks,
Ingo
| |