lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] i2c: s3c2410: dont need CPU_FREQ transitions for exynos series
From
Hi,

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
> <ch.naveen@samsung.com> wrote:
>> For Exynos4 and Exynos5 SoCs from Samsung the i2c clock is based
>> on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and therefore is completely
>> independent of the cpu frequency.
>> Thus, registering for a CPU freq notifier is very wasteful.
>>
>> This patch modifes the code such that, i2c bus registers to
>> cpu_freq_transition only if CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX is enabled.
>>
>> This change should save a bunch of cpufreq transitions calls
>> which does not apply to exynos SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> Use CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX instead of (CONFIG_CPU_FREQ & !CONFIG_EXYNOS)
>> As commented by Tomasz
>>
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Looks great to me. Thank you for the suggestions Tomasz, as always.

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

We need to come up with a solution for the CPU_FREQ stuff in
s3c2410_wdt too. We could use a similar solution but since the
CPU_FREQ stuff in s3c2410_wdt is more than just an optimization it
means that it's not good if S3C24XX is included in a multiplatform
kernel. (For the watchdog it's more than just an optimization since
every frequency transition actually pets the watchdog, making it
useless when you transition several times per second).

-Doug


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-15 18:21    [W:0.064 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site