Messages in this thread | | | From | Bhushan Bharat-R65777 <> | Subject | RE: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device | Date | Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:25:07 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:53 PM > To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Yoder Stuart-B08248; Kim Phillips; Christoffer Dall; Alex > Williamson; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com; > agraf@suse.de; Sethi Varun-B16395; peter.maydell@linaro.org; > santosh.shukla@linaro.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org > Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device > > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 02:45 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:33 AM > > > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > > > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kim Phillips; Christoffer Dall; Alex > > > Williamson; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > > a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com; agraf@suse.de; Sethi Varun-B16395; > > > Bhushan Bharat-R65777; peter.maydell@linaro.org; > > > santosh.shukla@linaro.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; > > > gregkh@linuxfoundation.org > > > Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a > > > platform device > > > > > > On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 14:44 -0500, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: > > > > Ah, think I understand now...yes that works as well, and would be > > > > less intrustive. So are you writing a patch? :) > > > > > > I've been meaning to since the previous round of discussion, but I've been > busy. > > > Would someone else be able to test it in the context of using it for VFIO? > > > > I wish I could have but I do not have vfio-platform stuff. > > VFIO PCI without new_id would also be a useful test.
I will do that :)
-Bharat
> > -Scott >
| |