lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: applesmc oops in 3.10/3.11
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:09:26PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> >>>>>> Warning message triggered with 3.12.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc21.x86_64.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ 10.886016] applesmc: key count changed from 261 to 1174405121
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Explains the crash, but the new key count is very wrong. 1174405121 = 0x46000001.
> >>>>> Which I guess explains the subsequent memory allocation error in the log.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Henrik, any idea what might be going on ? Is it possible that the previous
> >>>>> command failure leaves some state machine in a bad state ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I seem to recall a report on another similar state problem on newer
> >>>> machines, so maybe, yes. Older machines seem fine, I have never
> >>>> encountered the problem myself. Here is a patch to test that
> >>>> theory. It has been tested to be pretty harmless on two different
> >>>> generations.
> >>>>
> >>>> I really really do not want to add an 'if (value is insane)' check ;-)
> >>>>
> >>> Chris,
> >>>
> >>> any chance you can load this patch on an affected machine so we can get
> >>> test feedback ? This one is too experimental to submit upstream without
> >>> knowing that it really fixes the problem.
> >>
> >> Yes. What kernel.org source version should I apply it against? I'd use the non-debug config file from an equivalent version Fedora kernel, unless asked otherwise. And also should I test it on other vintages? I have here MBP4,1(2008); MBP8,2(2011), and MBP10,2(2012).
> >>
> > Only requirement is that it also includes the previous patch, so it would be
> > optimal if you can apply it on top of the previous image.
>
> Patch added on top of 3.12.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc20.x86_64 and built. But after ~dozen reboots, I'm not triggering the problem. The only items in dmesg with smc in it:
>
> [ 13.799819] applesmc: key=261 fan=2 temp=14 index=14 acc=1 lux=2 kbd=1
> [ 13.833402] input: applesmc as /devices/platform/applesmc.768/input/input10
>

Hi Chris,

That only means that you did not hit the problem. There may be some secondary
trigger (cold boot ? coffee on the cpu ?).

One thing I have seen in all logs is the earlier "send_byte fail" message, so
I think that is a pre-requisite.

Thanks,
Guenter


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-02 06:21    [W:0.129 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site