lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [resend][PATCH 03/16] dmaengine: introduce is_slave_xfer function
From
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:58:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > n 9 January 2013 19:20, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
>> >>> +static inline bool is_slave_xfer(enum dma_transfer_direction direction)
>> >>> +{
>> >>> + return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
>> >>> +}
>> >> After reading the subsequent patch I understand what is intent here. Perhaps
>> >> is_slave_dirn() would have been a beter one...
>> >
>> > dirn isn't readable, it took me some time to understand the intent...
>> > Either have xfer or direction :)
>>
>> Agree with Viresh. I might rename it to is_slave_direction if you want to.
> direction sounds fine too.

Okay, I'll rename it tomorrow and send v2 for that subseries and the
other patch where changelog should be fixed.

>
> --
> ~Vinod



--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-09 17:41    [W:0.068 / U:1.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site