Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Namhyung Kim <> | Subject | [PATCH] sched: Get rid of unnecessary checks from select_idle_sibling | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:50:56 +0900 |
| |
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
AFAICS @target cpu of select_idle_sibling() is always either prev_cpu or this_cpu. So no need to check it again and the conditionals can be consolidated.
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 ++++------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 5eea8707234a..af665814c216 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3254,25 +3254,16 @@ find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu) */ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target) { - int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p); struct sched_domain *sd; struct sched_group *sg; int i; /* - * If the task is going to be woken-up on this cpu and if it is - * already idle, then it is the right target. - */ - if (target == cpu && idle_cpu(cpu)) - return cpu; - - /* - * If the task is going to be woken-up on the cpu where it previously - * ran and if it is currently idle, then it the right target. + * If the task is going to be woken-up on this cpu or the cpu where it + * previously ran and it is already idle, then it is the right target. */ - if (target == prev_cpu && idle_cpu(prev_cpu)) - return prev_cpu; + if (idle_cpu(target)) + return target; /* * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an elegible idle cpu. -- 1.7.11.7
| |