Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:19:41 +0800 | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | Re: [patch v4 0/18] sched: simplified fork, release load avg and power awareness scheduling |
| |
On 01/27/2013 06:40 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:41:40AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> Just rerun some benchmarks: kbuild, specjbb2005, oltp, tbench, aim9, >> hackbench, fileio-cfq of sysbench, dbench, aiostress, multhreads >> loopback netperf. on my core2, nhm, wsm, snb, platforms. no clear >> performance change found. > > Ok, good, You could put that in one of the commit messages so that it is > there and people know that this patchset doesn't cause perf regressions > with the bunch of benchmarks. > >> I also tested balance policy/powersaving policy with above benchmark, >> found, the specjbb2005 drop much 30~50% on both of policy whenever >> with openjdk or jrockit. and hackbench drops a lots with powersaving >> policy on snb 4 sockets platforms. others has no clear change. > > I guess this is expected because there has to be some performance hit > when saving power... >
BTW, I had tested the v3 version based on sched numa -- on tip/master. The specjbb just has about 5~7% dropping on balance/powersaving policy. The power scheduling done after the numa scheduling logical.
| |