Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:00:32 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] USB: HID: SRW-S1 Gaming Wheel Driver | From | simon@mungewel ... |
| |
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, simon@mungewell.org wrote: > >> >> From: simon <simon@simon-virtual-machine.(none)> >> >> >> >> Add support the SRW-S1 by patching HID descriptor to read axis >> >> as Generic Desktop X, Y and Z (rather than Usage page being >> >> 'Simulation'). >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Wood <simon@mungewell.org> >> >> tested-by: John Murphy <rosegardener@freeode.co.uk> >> > >> > Hi Simon, >> > >> > thanks for the patch. >> > >> >> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/hid/Kconfig | 6 +++++ >> >> drivers/hid/Makefile | 1 + >> >> drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 + >> >> drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 3 +++ >> >> drivers/hid/hid-srws1.c | 58 >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > >> > Is hid-srws1 really the best name? My understanding is that the vendor >> is >> > called Steelseries, and we mostly stick to calling the drivers >> according >> > to the device vendors (and grouping the quirks accordingly). >> > >> > So how about hid-steelseries? >> >> I'm happy to change it; However Steelseries' other devices are all >> keyboards/mice intended for/marketed at gamers. Since other Steelseries >> devices are unlikely to have the same structure (OK I'm just guessing on >> that) is it better to keep this driver somewhat 'seperated'? >> >> I mean, not make life difficult trying to merge keyboard code in with >> this >> wheel's code.... if that is required in future. > > I don't think it's strictly required, but it seems to work quite nicely > for other drivers as well.
OK I'll wait a couple of days in-case any more comments come in and re-do the patch with the file name 'hid-steelseries.c' towards the end of the week.
Thanks, Simon
|  |