lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 10/30] USB: ehci-omap: Use PHY APIs to get the PHY device and put it out of suspend
On 01/28/2013 05:40 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>> For each port that is in PHY mode we obtain a PHY device using the USB PHY
>> library and put it out of suspend.
>>
>> It is upto platform code to associate the PHY to the controller's
>> port and it is upto the PHY driver to manage the PHY's resources.
>
> "up to" is two words, not one.

right :P

>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> index fd2f5450..a35e44e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ static const char hcd_name[] = "ehci-omap";
>>
>> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>>
>> +struct omap_hcd {
>> + struct usb_hcd *hcd;
>
> This pointer is not needed any more.
>
OK.

>> + struct usb_phy **phy; /* one PHY for each port */
>> + int nports;
>
> Is there a reasonable upper limit on the number of ports? If there is
> you could just put a fixed-size array here.

For now there are only 3 which is defined in OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS.

>
>> @@ -233,6 +240,39 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> hcd->rsrc_len = resource_size(res);
>> hcd->regs = regs;
>>
>> + omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
>> + omap->nports = pdata->nports;
>> + i = sizeof(struct usb_phy *) * omap->nports;
>> + omap->phy = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, i, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!omap->phy) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Memory allocation failed\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> You have to put a "goto" here, not a "return". The hcd must be cleaned
> up properly.

good catch!

>
>> @@ -295,11 +342,18 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
>
> What's with the weird spacing in the first two declarations? This
> isn't a typeset document where the paragraphs need to be fully
> justified. :-)

Funny that it is all over the place ;). I'll fix it around whatever I touch.
>
>> + int i;
>>
>> usb_remove_hcd(hcd);
>> disable_put_regulator(dev->platform_data);
>> usb_put_hcd(hcd);
>
> This line must be moved down. When the hcd is deallocated, the
> omap_hcd structure goes with it.

Good one. Will fix.
>
>> + for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
>> + if (omap->phy[i])
>> + usb_phy_shutdown(omap->phy[i]);
>> + }
>> +
>

regards,
-roger



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-28 17:21    [W:0.263 / U:0.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site