[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86: Make Linux guest support optional
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:42:32AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> No, not really as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() in no way implies that the code
> using it lives in the mainline.

I didn't say that - I said "any code (proprietary included) can link to
those symbols" meaning that I cannot possibly convert proprietary code
to which I don't have access to, vs GPL code which is out there.

> Also, EXPORT_SYMBOL() does not imply that it forms an ABI and can't be
> changed ever.

And yet, I don't want to be on the receiving end of the complaints when
those do change. But that's beside the point.

So I think we're on the same page: I'll make everything using x86_hyper*
depend on CONFIG_HYPERVISOR_GUEST and all are happy.



Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-25 20:41    [W:0.093 / U:4.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site