lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3.5] dw_dmac: return proper residue value
From
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Who is going to right on ctlhi/lo?
>
> Ahh, my English :( (/s/right/write)
>
>> dwc_do_single_block()
>>
>>> we write to ctlhi/lo only when we program new
>>> transfer. and that is not going to happen while we are in middle of a transfer.
>>
>> We have got a tasklet running inside tx_status call. Isn't possible?
>> tasklet runs scan_descriptors, that continues transfer in soft LLP mode.
>
> But we have just executed scan_descriptor() before this function and it doesn't
> look possible that transfer wasn't over then and inbetween these calls we got an
> interrupt, scheduled an tasklet and called dwc_do_single_block() :)

Yeah, the keyword is "look". 1 per million cases it could be true. I
think this discussion is going to the dead end.
Anyone else would like to argue for one or the other opinion?

I might obey your way with the commentary that with quite lower
possibility we could have an issue there.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-25 11:21    [W:0.050 / U:1.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site