lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: module: put modules in list much earlier.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:46:25AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> > Rusty, should the commit below be applied to the 3.7-stable kernel tree?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Good point. looks like commit which caused this (e9bda3b) went in 3.6
> so I think you'll want the following:
>
> 0d21b0e3477395e7ff2acc269f15df6e6a8d356d module: add new state MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED
> 1fb9341ac34825aa40354e74d9a2c69df7d2c304 module: put modules in list much earlier.
> ee61abb3223e28a1a14a8429c0319755d20d3e40 module: fix missing module_mutex unlock

Thanks, the second one required a bit of tweaking by hand, but it looks
good now, all applied.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-24 20:22    [W:0.051 / U:1.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site