lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Subject[patch v4 16/18] sched: don't care if the local group has capacity
    Date
    In power aware scheduling, we don't care load weight and
    want not to pull tasks just because local group has capacity.
    Because the local group maybe no tasks at the time, that is the power
    balance hope so.

    Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
    ---
    kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++++-
    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

    diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
    index a1ccb40..94bd40b 100644
    --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
    +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
    @@ -4767,8 +4767,12 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
    * extra check prevents the case where you always pull from the
    * heaviest group when it is already under-utilized (possible
    * with a large weight task outweighs the tasks on the system).
    + *
    + * In power aware scheduling, we don't care load weight and
    + * want not to pull tasks just because local group has capacity.
    */
    - if (prefer_sibling && !local_group && sds->this_has_capacity)
    + if (prefer_sibling && !local_group && sds->this_has_capacity
    + && env->perf_lb)
    sgs.group_capacity = min(sgs.group_capacity, 1UL);

    if (local_group) {
    --
    1.7.12


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-01-24 05:21    [W:4.063 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site