lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 09/22] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task
On 01/22/2013 05:52 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 15:50 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your suggestions and example, Mike!
>> I just can't understand the your last words here, Sorry. what the
>> detailed concern of you on 'both performance profiles with either
>> metric'? Could you like to give your preferred solutions?
>
> Hm.. I'll try rephrasing. Any power saving gain will of necessity be
> paid for in latency currency. I don't have a solution other than make a
> button, let the user decide whether history influences fast path task
> placement or not. Any other decision maker will get it wrong.

Um, if no other objection, I'd like to move the runnable load only used
for power friendly policy -- for this patchset, they are 'powersaving'
and 'balance', Can I?

>
> -Mike
>


--
Thanks Alex


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-23 02:02    [W:0.091 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site