lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PULL] kms locking rework
From
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]).
>> At a 1st look it seems to be OK.
>> Any tests you want me to run?
>
> Imo the fundamentals of the series are well-tested with the i-g-t
> series, so running things on as many (non-i915) gpus as possible is
> the most interesting thing. I just don't have that many radeon/nouveau
> machines lying around for that ...
>

I am here on SNB, so.

> If you want to get really fancy, set up a zaphod dual-head config with
> 2 independent X servers to check whether concurrent pageflips don't
> cause havoc. That needs something which pageflips, ofc.

Sounds like a lot of work...
Any docs/wiki around to manage such a setup?

- Sedat -

> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-20 23:01    [W:0.027 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site