lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Unique commit-id for "mm: compaction: [P,p]artially revert capture of suitable high-order page"
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:09:11PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:27:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:12:45PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >> Hi Linus,
> > >>
> > >> I see two different commit-id for an identical patch (only subject
> > >> line differs).
> > >> [1] seems to be applied directly and [2] came with a merge of akpm-fixes.
> > >> What is in case of backports for -stable kernels?
> > >
> > > I do not expect it to matter. I was going to use
> > > 8fb74b9fb2b182d54beee592350d9ea1f325917a as the commit ID whenever I got
> > > the complaint mail from Greg's tools about a 3.7 merge failure. The 3.7.2
> > > backport looks like this.
> > >
> >
> > Oh cool and thanks!
> > Are you planning to resend this backport-patch to the lists w/ a "3.7"
> > (or for-3.7) in the commit-subject?
> >
>
> Yes, when I get the reject mail from Greg's tools.

You should have that rejection email now :)



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-14 19:01    [W:0.068 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site